|
|||||||||||||||||||
Chemical and Process Engineering |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
A S Jessup-Bould: Problem Solving and Innovative Skills |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
All of the projects which I have worked on have
required me to solve problems; however there are a number which I found
particularly satisfying. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
"Puffing Billy": |
120,000 m3 Gas Holder
Purging |
||||||||||||||||||
OSC were in |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
An
inert gas generator was the obvious answer, however
the long delivery times quoted by potential suppliers would have had a
seriously detrimental effect on the programme. It
was however possible to buy a diesel fuel burner quite easily, so I developed
a design using the burner that could be fabricated locally. My concept consisted of the burner,
firing in to a horizontal carbon steel pipe which was cooled by being
submerged in a water bath. The products of combustion were directed, via an
elbow at the end of the pipe, in to the first of two vertical towers in which
the gas was cooled by water circulated from a nearby lagoon. The combustion
tube was a loose fit at the bottom of the tower to allow for thermal
expansion and a "Chinaman’s Hat" helped prevent water entering the
tube. I prepared the basic sketches and calculated the main parameters.
Detailed design was completed at OSC’s |
||||||||||||||||||
"Puffing Billy", as it
became known was successfully operated, enabling the project programme to be
met and saving the substantial costs of nitrogen imports. Furthermore, the equipment
is now available for further use should the need arise. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Synthesis
Gas for Ammonia Production Sable Chemicals
in Zimbabwe produce hydrogen for their ammonia plant using the world’s
largest electrolysis plant. This requires half the electricity available from
the Kariba Hydroelectric power station. Not only is
this an immensely costly process, but it also deprives the rest of the
country from a significant amount of power that could help this developing
nation prosper in so many other ways. Sable
Chemicals had already been in dialogue with OSC to investigate utilising ammonia from the coke oven gas produced at an
installation they had built nearby. The amounts required by Sable were
however far in excess of that which could be supplied by this means. I was
delegated to be part of a team to investigate other technologies which could
be employed to solve this problem. Important criteria were that the solution
must neither create undue demands on the technological capabilities within
Zimbabwe nor on the amount of foreign expenditure required. My solution
was to use coke gasification to produce a synthesis gas containing
significant amounts hydrogen and carbon monoxide which could undergo shift
reactions to yield more hydrogen. This would be followed by scrubbing out
carbon dioxide (Benfield Process) and pressure swing adsorption to extract
hydrogen at the required level of purity. The
technology for coke gasification was already established in Zimbabwe and
there would be a plentiful supply of coke from the local works. The only
drawback was that air blown gasification would result in large quantities of
nitrogen in the synthesis gas and a correspondingly large plant would be
required to handle this until it could be separated at the PSA plant. Nitrogen for
ammonia synthesis was already being produced by Sable by cryogenic separation
from air, however a larger plant would be required
to meet an existing contract to provide oxygen, a by-product from the
electrolysis plant, to a nearby steel works. If surplus oxygen could be
produced, then this could be used instead of air in the gasifiers
to produce a gas devoid of nitrogen. As part of
the study I devised a series of oxygen
blown gasification trials on an existing 3 metre
diameter gasifier in Harare. These trials were
undertaken under my supervision and lasted for a month. Oxygen was supplied
in liquid form using tankers from the existing air separation plant at Sable
Chemicals. The results showed that this technology was feasible subject to
sufficient steam being provided with the oxygen. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Hazardous
Waste Vitrification The 'VERT'
contract required the design of a flue gas treatment system serving a
hazardous waste vitrification furnace. The system needed
to be capable of processing a flue gas having an extremely wide range of
different contaminants and the equipment materials of construction needed to
be capable of handling the wide range of corrosive components which might be
present. The flue gas treatment plant had to be designed to be
transportable for use with the furnace at different locations around One of the
most arduous services was the gas-to-gas heat exchanger which was used to
cool the hot gases off the furnace in order to enable downstream processing
and to use this heat to reheat the cleaned gases to minimise
the risk of plume formation at the exhaust stack. Problems
encountered in this heat exchanger were high temperatures, differential
thermal expansion, a range of oxidising and
reducing atmospheres, a range of corrosive chemical contaminants, risk of dewpoint conditions at
the heat transfer surface. A wide variety of materials were investigated, but
no materials could be guaranteed to be corrosion resistant. If 'exotic'
materials were to be used (eg hastelloy)
there was still a risk of failure under certain conditions. I decided
that the most cost effective solution was to simply use a carbon steel heat exchanger, incorporating a packed
floating head removable bundle. Hot and cold flue gases were arranged in
co-current flow to avoid tube wall temperatures falling below the lowest
predicted dewpoint temperature and corrosion
coupons were fitted to provide feedback under actual operating conditions. A
spare bundle would provide cover in the event of tube failure, giving time
for a replacement bundle to be fabricated, in a more suitable material
determined from analysis of the corrosion coupons. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||